Question:
Anatomy? Fibrous membrane that exists between the radius and the ulna?
Lindsey L
2009-10-12 14:16:06 UTC
-Fibrous membrane that exists between the radius and the ulna, allows for free movement at the proximal and distal shafts
a. suture
b. syndesmosis
c. synchondrosis
d. diathrosis
e. two of the above

-An example(s) of a amphiarthrotic joint(s) include(s):
A. pubis symphysis
B. gomphosis
C. knee joint
D. C1 - C2 (atlanto-occipital) jooint
E. squamosal suture

-The movements possible between Metacarpal I and the proximal phalanx of the pollex are best described as:
A. flexion
B. extension
C. abduction
D. adduction
E. all of the above

-The sacroiliac joint is best described as:
A. diarthrotic in childhood
B. synarthrotic in adulthood
C. diarthrotic in adulthood
D. two of the above
E. none of the above

-An example(s) of a amphiarthrotic joint(s) include(s):
A. pubis symphysis
B. gomophosis
C. knee joint
D. C1-C2 atlanto-occipital joint
E. squamosial suture
Three answers:
Jimmy
2009-10-13 07:12:51 UTC
B, A, E, A, A
2016-04-07 14:07:50 UTC
As a non-Christian, I question my right to answer this question. If you have a rock in your hand, there is not 100% conclusive proof that it exists. In fact, there is not 100% conclusive proof that YOU exist. Perhaps everything that comes together to form the body, the mind and the life is just part of one's own (pre-existing) imagination. In other words 'I think, therefore I am'. Anyways, I digress. However, there is something that I have faith in now. It is not a deity, but it is also something that I have never seen, and therefore have no conclusive evidence of, yet I strongly believe it exists. It is a scripture, present in absolutely everybody. It is not written, and can never BE written. There are simply no words that accurately describe what the scripture says, so to try and write it or speak it would be impossible. The only way to know the scripture is through all of our six human senses, most of all through feeling it. By 'feeling', I am referring to the sixth, the 'feeling' that is independent of the sense of touch. There have been a few people in the past who have tried to write this scripture, but the evidence shows it is ALWAYS mistranslated from the raw feeling it communicates. It cannot be described, it can only be known. There is only one way of getting to know it, and that is through love. When we learn to love, we have the skills to 'read' this, and we know it in everything we see that is not man-made. So who 'wrote' this scripture on our hearts and in our spirits? From my Atheistic opinion, it is a part of Nature, but a Theist will attribute the God(ess) they believe in as the author. However, by knowing the scripture, it becomes obvious that there is no matter who or what produced it, only the message itself is important. Think of a classroom. All of the children have different parents, but they are all there taking the same lesson. We are all children of different deities, but the scripture to learn is the same, and all too often, many of the children have forgotten the language the lesson is held in. It is the language they were born to. A BRILLIANT question (((((((Lady M))))))) Your husbunny
Matthew
2009-10-14 16:24:29 UTC
hahaha these are the exact questions from the online quiz! xD you're in Dr. Peterson's BY 115 @ UAB aren't you? :P


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...