Question:
If being gay is genetic, wouldn't that gene die off since the gays can't reproduce?
2015-09-05 07:56:47 UTC
If being gay is genetic, wouldn't that gene die off since the gays can't reproduce?
171 answers:
rinoa
2015-09-06 18:25:38 UTC
If being gay is genetic, wouldn't that gene die off since the gays can't reproduce? True. But being gay is NOT genetic. nor is a choice. of course.

It all goes back to pregnancy. One hormone produced from the mother during pregnancy affects the fetal greatly. Androgenic hormone or testoid. It's levels is associated with gender formation. It stimulates or controls the development of male characteristics. This includes the activity of the male sex organs and development of male secondary sex characteristics. This period affects the femininization (female) or masculinization(male) of the fetus and is a predictor of feminine or masculine behaviours such as sex typed behaviour.(straight/gay/bisexual).

For example if the fetus is a male. low levels of this hormone can lead to a deficiency in the masculinization process meaning that even though it's a male the mind is feminine since it didn't get it's dose of masculinization. and therefore to a possibility of the fetus to be according to today's society tags "gay" male.

So is this a defect? No. because god doesn't create defects. It's a natural process that can happen anytime at pregnancy. So truly being gay is being born this way just like being straight.
?
2015-09-06 14:26:45 UTC
Well, the gene wouldn't be pass on so...yes, I believe so.

However, being gay is not genetic; it is a choice. That is because all human beings are created pure and innocent, and being gay is a sin. It's a sin because it ruins families and halts the natural way of living which is reproducing and having a true family. Hope that makes sense :)
gillie
2015-09-05 09:11:47 UTC
You have a very simplistic, fifth grade understanding of genetics. There are over a hundred genes associated with height alone, so thinking that there is a single gene that totally controls sexuality is quite incorrect.



The research indicates that the same genetic profile observed in gay men is linked to increased fertility in their female relatives. Evolutionarily speaking, that's a big win. Not only does the family have more children, there's a childless uncle around to help provide for them. That means the genetic pattern will be preserved.
?
2015-09-06 05:25:21 UTC
Some studies say being gay is genetic some studies say its not.Untill I see a reliable source. (A source which other scientists have looked at) I don't think it matters.



When people say they were born gay they mean they have always felt that way about men. So from a young age. Some people like chocolate some people don't. You don't decide if you like chocolate or not your taste does. Taste doesn't come from genetics though. This is why you can't control if you're gay or not.This is true,you can't control your favourite food it can only be influenced.



I think because homosexuals weren't brought up gay,they are angry with society. Saying they were born gay takes away the pain of it for them.
John
2015-09-08 20:48:12 UTC
Genes are inherited from parents. Homosexuals can't directly reproduce but OTHER PARENTS DO.

It's NOT Homosexual Genetics that produce the result; it's the mixture of GENES through the Human

Species that does. Example Neil Patrick Harris is a Homosexual male; Sara Gilbert is a Homosexual

Female. SHE has given birth (via in vitro fertilization) to a child THIS YEAR. IF their reproductive cells

were led 'in vitro' to conception and Full Term Pregnancy NOTHING SAYS that the resultant baby would

be born Homosexual. It is OVERWHELMINGLY more likely for the child to grow into a Heterosexual

adult.
2015-09-05 08:02:43 UTC
If being gay is genetic, wouldn't that gene die off since the gays can't reproduce? Sionists want to be the only white people. So, they promote contraceptives (early abortion), interracial marriage, homosexuality, abortion (aborted babies go to hell for 33 and a half years and a demon is freed from hell), etc. not for them, but for white Goyim. Obama will destroy the Dollar. Euro will be world currency. Obama is a good puppet to Sionists. He does what he's told, obviously. Sionists want to attack Iran. So, they need an excuse, which will be the Statue of Liberty. New Sodom (New York) will be flooded after an explosion in the sea; New Gomorah (Los Angeles) will follow after. Look at what Seraphim Rose had to endure. He was a homosexual, but repented. Now he is one the great saints of the Orthodox Church. Pray to Seraphim Rose; he'll help you. Forgive me.
?
2015-09-07 00:36:07 UTC
Given that the rate of homosexuality has been in a steady state for as many generations as we know about evidently the 'gene' has remained. Many folks reproduce before, or after they come out as 'gay'. Why people even care about this is the real question. In this country if it wasn't for cheesy TV Jesus freak preachers this wouldn't even be a topic of discussion.
?
2015-09-06 09:09:49 UTC
Given that the rate of homosexuality has been in a steady state for as many generations as we know about evidently the 'gene' has remained. Many folks reproduce before, or after they come out as 'gay'. Why people even care about this is the real question. In this country if it wasn't for cheesy TV Jesus freak preachers this wouldn't even be a topic of discussion.
mikeburns55
2015-09-08 10:20:33 UTC
Cancer and diabetes have a large genetic predisposition too. Yet those diseases haven't caused the people with them to die off yet.



There's a conundrum though. Gay people like to say "We were born this way" which implies a genetic cause. But then you look at statistics and it's shown that a lot of homosexual people have been sexually abused, many more than straight people, so there also seems to be a part that is molded by experience, or nurturing.
ALVIN NEBREJA
2015-09-07 00:20:57 UTC
Honestly Speaking I'm a Gay since I was young or since the time I can remember things. Its not a Genes nor an influence being gay . Its just happen we born this way. remembering my childhood days I grew up bullied by my friends, classmate, neighbor or even my Family so I always ask God "why I am Like this, different from they have wanted/expected" ...If I have an option I choose to be straight ,to live simply ,happy and accepted in the society. I'm not a kind of gay who dress like a lady . I always act to be a man so that I can be respected but Im not happy keeping myself away from what i am. Being gay is not a sin its al about how you respect yourself and the others . As long as you are happy being you who I am to be judge ..
2015-09-06 06:35:26 UTC
Whomever wrote this question has a point. The gene would eventually die out anyways, even if it is a mutation. I always thought people who became gay or perverted, that it wasn't just hormones, but also some dejection, rejection, and a trauma that drove them to that, and so that happened. The few, theoretical 1%-5% that claim it is "genetic" would have it die out even if it is a recessive gene. That is what I have always thought. Doesn't mean other things can't drive people to become gay.
Bex
2015-09-08 08:18:57 UTC
Homosexuality is not genetic, but if it were it wouldn't mean that the genetic path would end because genes can be dormant or depending on whether they are dominant or recessive they can be passed on to someone without that person showing any sign of carrying the gene. Therefore if homosexuality were genetic it would not necessarily mean that the gene would die off, because people on average have more than one child and so the gene can be carried on and passed through many generations.
Lexi
2015-09-08 15:47:43 UTC
This is wrong on many levels. For one, being gay is not embedded in human genetics. Also, your idea that the gene would die off is incorrect. There are things known as recessive genes which can be continuously passed down through the generations by a carrier. If the carrier were to meet another individual with the recessive trait, the offspring would have a 25% chance of being gay in simplistic terms. Another point to be made is that there are things known as polygenic traits which means that there are multiple genes working together in order to get one phenotype. Your understanding of biology is lacking as well as your understanding for gay lifestyle choices.
?
2015-09-05 08:36:18 UTC
For one thing, gays can reproduce. Homosexuality might have genetic factors. Saying genetic factors are involved is not the same as saying genes are the cause. Studies have indicated that homosexuality tends to occur in families. Studies have been done on identical twins, one of the twins straight and the other one gay. There also exists the possibility that homosexuality carries evolutionary or other undiscovered benefit(s).

I have to leave, but what I have said suffices to show that homosexuality is a complex issue.
Tom
2015-09-06 02:08:36 UTC
well a lot of gay people where forced to reproduce by soceity for a long time , and some gay people don't know they are gay , and it can also skip generations or mutate etc. plus hormones are a factor as well etc.



But even if there isn't a gay gene persé , its already proven gay people have brains that are different from heterosexual, even at a young age (really interesting study, they scanned kids brains at younger age and later when they where adults and knew what their sexuality was they compared them ) so they are still born that way.
2015-09-05 08:25:29 UTC
It seems that the gene is passed down the female side of the family. So if a gay mans sister has boys there is a higher probability that her sons will be gay. There are many genetic traits that are passed down only on the female side, Females have XX chromosomes, males have XY so, therefore, the genetic component of exclusive male homosexuality is in the extra X chromosome of the female family members. In fact humans seem to be naturally casually bi-sexual. Studies of cultures globally and historically have shown that bi-sexuality was perfectly acceptable behaviour in most cultures except cultures that have grown out of the Abrahamic religions. So it seems that strict heterosexuality is the unnatural behaviour constructed from the cultural taboos of Abrahamic cultures. The fact that our closest genetic relatives, Chimps and Bonobos are bi-sexual only seems to emphasise this fact. It's not too hard to confirm these facts with the magic of Google.
Me
2015-09-11 20:48:28 UTC
This is just a hypothesis, but taking a biospychosocial approach maybe those who were gay in the past didn't want to be a victim of peoples prejudices so they reproduced. This would allow a "gay gene" to be passed on if it existed. If we allow gay's to adopt kids, then there may be not be as many homosexuals in the future.
Casey
2015-09-05 19:47:16 UTC
I agree with another commenter who said that people tend to think of it only as being either a choice or genetic. The jury's still out on whether it's genetic, but environmental factors may also play a role. Straight parents still manage to produce gay children. Still, I personally don't think it can be a conscious choice. I don't think someone can wake up and decide to be gay.
Lola
2015-09-05 14:05:48 UTC
It is not genetic although some men are very pretty and men like this and so these people might have far more opportunities to be seduced.

There is a sexual abuse component which is never discussed or rarely If your father has sex with a brother and the brother is exposed to a loose idea of sexuality,be he may become gay or bi.

There are who just do an over night and are jerked off and enjoy this more then the bargaining he must do for sex from a girl. It s complicated but let s be nice to each other.
?
2015-09-06 14:31:09 UTC
There are sets of identical twins where one is definitely gay and the other not. Examples would be Leigh and Leslie Keno from Antiques Roadshow and the notorious Kray brothers, London gangsters from the sixties. Such twins rule out a genetic cause. The best current explanation of male gayness is antibodies to testosterone in the mother which can affect the fetus if there is blood leakage across the placenta. Since this can happen to one twin and not the other, it explains well the identical twin conundrum. It also explains why gayness is more common in the later sons because the antibodies could have formed from the previous pregnancies.
2015-09-06 13:59:00 UTC
If being gay is genetic.....??? Genetics does play apart of some things but when we look at how we were made its good to refer to Bible. The Bible doesn't comment on the biology of homosexuals, although it acknowledges that some traits are deeply ingrained in people (2 Corinthians 10:4,5) But the Bible does make it clear that God designed sex to be engaged in only between a male and a female and only with the arrangement of marriage. (Genesis 1:27,28 and Leviticus 18:22 and Proverbs 5:18,19) Reasoning: A male claims to be a woman born a man, where's the evidence of menstruation, along with child birth? Never! And vice a versa -- a woman cannot impregnate another woman. To blame genetics is based on the flawed notion that humans must act on their sexual impulses. The Bible dignifies humans by assuring us that we can choose not to act on improper sexual urges if we truly want to. (Colossians 3:5). Many see gay as nothing more than an alternative lifestyle. Attitudes of gay may differ from one generation to another or from one land to another. Some people may praise "coming out" as gay, lesbian or bisexual as a courageous act but then others condemn them for their debauchery. Gay people cannot reproduce as same sex couples. They have to go outside the relationship to obtain donor sperm so that alone tells you they were not born that way. Gene? But the truth is we must look into what our creator God has to say.
sophieb
2015-09-05 16:10:22 UTC
well you'd have thought that was the case about ten years ago but the old style gay was both male and female and chose to be male (lesbians chose to be female). No one said they couldn't reproduce if they had female organs. But since about 10 years ago people decided that gay was a choice even if they were straight, so your theory totally went out the window.



Before gays had an agenda a gay man would have a straight wife and have kids and they would live married and the guy wouldn't come out of the closet. Families used to have secrets.
2015-09-05 12:30:17 UTC
No gene for sexuality has been found. Even if there is one there are at least three reasons that the gene may not be selected against.



1. Being gay is not a harm phenotype so there's no pressure to select against it.



2. Many gay people may not be parents but are often involved with their siblings' children. Such altruism may be selected for.



3. Many gay people are parents. Their progeny nearly always being straight. I know no gay parent with gay children. This is evidence against a genetic component.



It's almost certain that a large number of factors determine anyone's sexuality.
WOOWHO
2015-09-05 12:06:59 UTC
If being Guy is Genetic wouldn't that Gene die off since gays can not reproduce ?



If you Think about your last part of your question , think it through if Gays do not reproduce then Gays are a product of heterosexuals . so they carry the genes for being gay



Homosexual is about 2% or more of the total population ,



something happens during GESTATION that contributes to Homosexuality



so that gene or events in gestation are being studied .



We have lots of genetics passed down ,



hair color eye color baldness height bone structure



there are conditions like Huntington's disease



a genetic progressive deterioration of the brain effecting motor function speech and cognition



all of brain functions the cause is a SINGLE gene on Chromosome 4



How do you know you will get it genetic testing before having children



do most people do genetic testing before having children NO



symptoms start usually age 30 to 50 years old .



there is little means to have people get genetic testing



. we still have not identified what genes control every thing .



lost of variables , especially when two people contribute to one off spring



person A vs B and the genes in peoples blood line and some people are not aware of medical history



and remember not too long ago People HID being Homosexual



many were forced by society to appear heterosexual if they did not they were subject to death in some countries discrimination run out of towns tormented , some committed suicide and stayed in behind door communities
?
2015-09-06 14:20:01 UTC
What actually happens is that during the early days/weeks of pregnancy, a pregnant woman releases certain hormones that determine whether the baby will be male or female including the rudimentary sexual leanings that new being will have. The hormones affect the genes that determine whether the fetus will identify as a male or female (which is how we get transgenders born into a body they are not comfortable occupying; and how we get a person of one gender who prefers to dress as another gender too). Same sort of thing happens in early utero (hormone release) will affect whether the baby is shy or outgoing--and that what is released during that hormone release often depends on how the mother-to-be is feeling. If she's feeling uncertainty & doubt about the future herself, if she's feeling happy & optimistic--will affect which hormones get released at that time which will affect the baby. And, of course, the hormones could get messed up, too much of one, not enough of another, etc. which will affect the baby (and who knows why things get messed up in the body but they do). The workings of the body are real real real complicated.
?
2015-09-07 07:50:01 UTC
OMG it is genetic but it's almost kind of an error in dna that happens. It's not like in your genes that you're going to pass on to your kids. That's why a lot of straight parents have gay kids.
Joe Pizza
2015-09-07 13:39:27 UTC
No silly. It's the straight degenerates that come together and create mutated genes.



Although there are some gay guys who have sex with women and have children. I suspect if this happens there's a chance the children will also be gay.



In genetics if both parents have brown hair there is absolutely no chance of the child having any other hair color besides brown. On the other hand if one parent has brown hair and the other has blond hair the child could either have brown or blond hair depending on the dominant gene. If being gay is genetic then the same would hold true if one parent was straight and the other were gay.
?
2015-09-06 01:25:38 UTC
If a particular trait is necessary or doesn't hinge absolutely on species survival, it won't die out. For example, despite left handedness having a few minor advantages, only 10% of the population is left handed because being left handed is something that won't kill you. By the same token, we have noticed that homosexual tendencies occur mainly in animals with social groups, which has led to an interesting hypothesis. This hypothesis states that homosexual couples are practical and necessary because they can raise a child who has been orphaned, which hetero couples often don't do because they're busy with their own offspring.
?
2015-09-05 08:04:45 UTC
Everything in a sense is genetic! The problem with ignorant and uneducated masses is that they don't understand the concept of "innateness".



So we have to talk about "genetics".



Bear in mind, throughout all of human history gays were persecuted so they had to stay in the closet. Which means they had to marry and impregnate their wives and have children.



Now that things are changing it may indeed be an interesting question as to how much penetrance gayness as a genetic trait has.
Ben Jo
2015-09-06 19:15:36 UTC
The anthropological reason for gays surviving in the wilderness was women had companions to take care of their offsprings, so they weren't killed off. I researched the epigenetic reason for the "gay gene" experiment. It turns out that it was flawed. Look it up yourself! The experiment was based on mice having blah chromosome, this and that..This is not doing science any justice. Coming to conclusions based on mice experiments and telling everyone it's okay to be gay, is NOT doing REAL SCIENCE. I've asked biologists in colleges and they all say the study was hokum. The socialists are trying to find a "scientific" reason to start a gay revolution which already happened in America.
busterwasmycat
2015-09-07 08:06:39 UTC
only if it were an on-off condition that expresses as dominant when present (and it is apparently neither). Besides, being homosexual doesn't make you infertile and unable to have sex with women and thus create children, it is just a decrease of likelihood of that happening.



There is actually a school of thought that explains homosexuality in terms of an evolutionary benefit, that although the individual may not reproduce, the group success increases because of these non-reproducing members of the population.
?
2015-09-05 07:59:54 UTC
There's no evidence to suggest that homosexuality is genetic in the sense of it being an inherited trait. It may be epigenetic, in that environmental factors may influence gene expression in the developing fetus.



Most fundies are so woefully ignorant of biology that don't realise there are more than two options: genetic or choice.
?
2015-09-05 08:03:52 UTC
To me, it doesn't matter whether I understand why I am bisexually inclined. I don't remember God bringing up DNA as a contributor of why people are sinners. He did teach, some say enigmatically, about cutting parts of ourselves off if that is what offends us about ourselves. But like I said, it was an enigmatic teaching according to some because he wasn't telling us to cut ourselves, it was supposed to show how ridiculous it is to make excuses for what troubles us. And it would seem futile to try to scratch our DNA out, wouldn't it?



But I do know that because I trust in Jesus Christ, I maintain peace with God thereby. That's his covenant, an he made he rules. He didn't base his covenant on whether a person was LGBT or not.
?
2015-09-07 11:07:57 UTC
Bruh, really? If there was a gay gene, it wouldn't die off because of two things. Thing #1: Just because someone is gay and won't have good O' intimacy with their opposite sex in order to reproduce doesn't mean they can't. Gay men will just send their sperm to a woman who is willing to give birth to their children. Or lesbians will just retrieve a sperm from a donor so they can have children. Or any other way just to reproduce. Thing #2: Your parents pass down genes that makes you YOU. So there a certain genes that are hidden between your siblings and yourself that yo mom and dad gave that you don't use. If you got the gay gene (if that's a thing) than your siblings may also receive the gay gene but it is hidden. So you become gay. They don't become gay, but chances are their offsprings will. It's like your parents. If both parents are heterosexual, and the had homosexual genes that were passed down to you, they weren't gay. Because that gene was hidden from them.
Evelin Gayle
2015-09-07 15:14:15 UTC
It's not genetic. It's environmental. Like schotzofrantic
Blackmarket
2015-09-06 22:31:51 UTC
I'm pretty sure its not genetic but its how your grown up if your with a single mom or two fathers I adopted your ganna take your parents traits. That doesn't mean your ganna be gay but your more likely. If your moms watching magic mike xxl and buying barbies for you might take on that path or you may not and the two fathers will make you feel like it okay which I is. So its really your decision but its kinda set by your parent, interest, and what your role models are like.
Carson
2015-09-07 04:45:48 UTC
It could technically be genetic. Not all phenotypes (Physical result of genes) are simply passed in the manner of a dominant gene from one parent beating the recessive gene from the other.



There are many genes making up your height. If your sexuality is genetic, it must be made of many genes seeing there are bisexuals, pansexuals and asexuals, not just homosexuals. We will call these genes SGenes.



This could lead you to believe that being homosexual depends on many genes lining up just right. Imagine one parent has an SGenotype of xx,yY,ZZ. The other has an SGenotype of xX,yY, ZZ. Both parents are straight, not bisexual, and give birth to a gay kid because the SGenotype needed to make a homosexual child is X,Y,Z, and the kid, out of chance, got that SGenotype.



In simpler words: Maybe it just takes a certain combination of genes for homosexuality to be present.



This theory, if it is true, allows homosexuality and other sexualities to be genetically passed on. Of course it is just a theory.
2015-09-05 08:06:31 UTC
Let's say that being gay isn't genetic at all, and happens purely by choice.



What is the problem with two consenting adults choosing to date or have sex?
?
2015-09-05 08:20:46 UTC
Why can you not understand it has always been there? That is why the bible mentions it!



Why is it that this troubles BAD Chrsitians so much?



Primitive religion has always lagged behind the improvement in moral attitudes and that is what these people are doing to Christianity – keeping it primitive!



There were people who opposed the abolition of slavery, emancipation for women, the banning of discrimination of women, the attempts to eradicate racism and now the need to eradicate homophobia!



Taking one sin to indulge in intolerance, hatred, bigotry, homophobia and persecution will never be acceptable in the eyes of God!



Christian leaders from around the world have clearly stated their opposition to the "victimization or diminishment" of gays and lesbians, saying demonizing and persecuting them was "totally against Christian charity and basic principles of pastoral care".



"We say that no one should have to live in fear because of the bigotry of others."



The Mormons poured millions into forcing through prop 8 in CA: to ban gay marriage. In August 2010 the court held that to be unconstitutional. On 15 June 2011 the San Francisco court upheld that decision because it violates the constitutional rights of citizens. On 7 February 2012 the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals struck the California law again finding that the California state constitution banning same-sex marriage violated principles of due process and equal protection under the law.



The court found that the ban violated equality laws to target a minority group and withdraw a right that it possessed, without a legitimate reason for doing so. Proposition 8 serves no purpose, and has no effect, other than to lessen the status and human dignity of gays and lesbians in California. The constitution simply does not allow for laws of this sort.



The Supreme Court upheld the early court decision and has now stated that gay marriage is legal in ALL STATES! Thus gay marriage is legal and anyone who shows intolerance, hatred, bigotry, homophobia and persecution towards them faces the CRIMINAL LAW and the charges are rated as HATE CRIME with severe sentences!



Sadly Christianity is being destroyed and criminalized by people who use the bible as their excuse for totally unchristian behaviour.



The loving god works in mysterious ways.
Georgia
2015-09-09 05:22:46 UTC
The scientific genetic research you're talking about doesn't require both biological parents to be "gay" to pass on the "gay" gene. It can be passed on from heterosexual couples. Please see my source.

These finding are not conclusive and they are not sure what brings a person to be attracted to the same sex. Most probably it's a combination of factors, genes, hormones, your experiences in life, etc… There are also natural occurrences of “gay” behavior in the animal kingdom.
?
2015-09-10 19:25:14 UTC
In addition to the many excellent points expressed above, it's thought that cerrtian genes that might make women more intensely attractive to men (and reproduce more) could also occasionally get passed to male sons. This means that the gene may not die out entirely.



This is a good video explaining it in a far more eloquent way than I just did.



https://youtu.be/9T5vHi-WrMk
🤔 Jay
2015-09-05 08:08:35 UTC
It is certainly genetic! And may be passed on through the mother's side like baldness.



This has been the medical school teachings since the 1960s...
Rebecca B
2015-09-05 11:53:16 UTC
Gay and lesbian individuals can and do certainly reproduce. You never heard of surrogacy? Or IVF? Or the many uses for a turkey baster? Or the many lesbian couples who recruit a male, often gay, friend to act as sperm donor (and vice versa)?



Also the heterosexual siblings of gay/lesbian individuals can reproduce and who knows what recessive (and potentially 'homosexual') genes they're carrying.
?
2015-09-09 09:24:36 UTC
Being gay is a sinful life, but since man's nature is carnal, it is normal for the carnal heart to lead people to do all sorts of wickedness. While this gay will die, the wicked heart will always be renewed in the next generation, and only by the blood of Jesus and the indwelling Holy Spirit can the carnal wicked heart be put to death, until only Jesus is living in me.
Cal King
2015-09-11 09:37:54 UTC
You are correct, any gene that codes for homosexual behavior will be eliminated by natural selection. Therefore it is implausible for homosexuality to be encoded by genes. Homosexuals claim that they are born that way, but that is a misconception, because identical twins, which have identical genes, may have different sexual orientation. Further, there are people born with fetishes, such as shoe fetishes, and there simply cannot be a gene for such behavior either because shoes did not exist in nature while humans evolved.



The most likely cause of homosexuality is imprinting. Many animals rely on imprinting to form an image of what their potential mates should look, smell or sound like. Imprinting usually happens while animals are juveniles, when theses animals are being raised by their parents. Once imprinted, it is nearly impossible to change. For example, geese would normally be raised by their parents in the wild and they would imprint on the adult geese that raise them. Geese raised in captivity, OTOH, sometimes may imprint upon humans, beach balls and shoes as their potential mates. Such facts show that humans also rely on imprinting to form an image of their potential mates. If mistakes are made during the imprinting process, then some individuals can indeed imprint upon the wrong sex. Since mistakes happen, there is therefore no way for homosexuality to vanish as long as conditions that can result in imprinting mistakes are still around. Hitler, for example, thought that by killing all the known homosexuals, he would be able to eliminate homosexuality, but he was dead wrong because doing so does not eliminate the causes of homosexuality. If genes are in fact responsible for homosexuality, then natural selection would have eliminated it, just as natural selection has eliminated any human that walks on four legs.
philip
2015-09-08 09:31:49 UTC
There is currently no hard science definitively proving that homosexuality is genetic. It can be a choice but many have indicted that it can also be a natural attraction apart from a decision. Similar to Autism in the sense that there has been no physiological, genetic component identified, but clearly something more than nuture over nature, homosexuality is a medical / scientifc / psychological mystery. It may be genetic, but that has yet to be seen and proven.
2015-09-05 23:34:42 UTC
That is a myth, there is NO gay gene, science hasn't found it. They've done tests on twins where one was gay and the other wasn't. Homosexuality develops later in life
king_davis13
2015-09-05 11:56:36 UTC
Because it is a genetic condition that comes form parents that don't exhibit the trait. If it were only carried by homosexuals it would die off but it is carried by everyone and is completely natural in almost every life form that we have investigated, not just humans. Hope this helps.
2015-09-05 11:54:44 UTC
Various genes that result in early death have survived. Why not a gene for homosexuality?



And haven't you ever heard of spontaneous mutations?



Finally, it may not be a gene, or it may be an otherwise inactive gene activated in combination with another factor. Pre-natal hormone exposure is a subject getting research attention.
Big Bill
2015-09-05 08:07:14 UTC
If such is genetic, it is an anomaly that arises naturally in a small segment of the human species, as in a flaw that come up once every 10,000 or so persons (or fewer).



Then, it is cultivated by the nurture said individual receives either deliberately or inadvertently that acts to perpetuate the same.



Homosexuality is seen in many species and not merely in human kind.
?
2015-09-05 20:42:04 UTC
Gay people do, in practice, have children. We all do things we don't enjoy occasionally.

How many sexual encounters do you need to have to produce 2.4 children?



Like other people have said, female relatives of gay men have more children than avaerage, so it could be an X chromasome trait. Probably not just one gene and not everyone who inherits these genes is automatically gay. It could also be that a heterozygote (one copy of a mutant gene) is highly fertile, or sexier, or better at child rearing than average, but a homozygote (two copies of the mutant gene) is gay. Plenty of genes get passed on this way.



Also gay uncles and aunts could help their brothers and sisters with child rearing. In a small community in which most people are related, a "celibate" priest (for instance) could play an important social role, keeping everyone cooperating for the good of the group. Putting a brake on human reproductive urges for a while in adolescence could have real benefits for a tribal group, and many cultures segregate teenage boys and girls into same sex groups as they approach adulthood. I'm not intending to annoy religious people here, just consider that homosexuals and religious people may actually have similar social and evolutionary agendas. I remember a disillusioned ex Catholic priest saying that the priesthood was what homosexuals from Italian villages did with their lives. Rather than absurdly trying to exclude gay people, religions should accept that they are to a large extent a product of homosexuality, that many of those medieval monks and nuns who flagellated each other to "mortify the flesh" were in fact homosexual, that monasticism is an attempt to provide stability in a society having difficulty feeding itself (also, Medieval society was to a large extent unofficially polygamous, with wealthy aristocrats fathering illegitimate children on working class women, and villages full of peasant bachelors). See also: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12110-999-1011-z



Humans can screw around like crazy and produce huge numbers of babies if they really want to, but for most of human history, it isn't how many babies you have that counts, so much as how many of them reach adulthood. Social stability and extended family have always been important for ensuring that children get through the extremely long development period (how many other animals take 16+ years to reach maturity?).
dude
2015-09-07 15:32:32 UTC
We all have the same amount of genes. It's how they are expressed that matters. It is obvious that straight couples can have gay children. It does not mean the human race will go extinct.
John
2015-09-06 22:15:37 UTC
is fashion ,when is some thing fashion even if be recluse ,they'll make it look good . prosecution of top hookers it call porn star and every nice *** or nice boobs it wish to become one .A kids that her mother have different mans every single night will think ,it's OK to his girl friend or wife be with any man and that is normal for him cause his mom did the same .With these rate of the gays or lesbians ,then there must be generic problem cause they are more than straight people ,If I'm not wrong .W call it blind minds like group of sheep that if leader jump the cliff whole the group will jump after it .Fact is 1 in million chromosome may confuse harmonic not 100,000 in 1,000,000 and that is society fault that mean a society that homosexual is normal as straight sex ,then freak sex would be normal too .Sex with animals ,toys ,kids,hookers,mother or father or even brother and sister is way even over the animal kingdom ,cause even animals they do sex with their own type .This is brought the human in many lower level than the animal.Bi- sexual , Homosexual ,freak sexual all are invasion of diseases or let's call it walking diseases .Now does not matter they have e-bola or Aids ,scientifically problem can be solved as long as people are educated or drugs can solve the problem .Mess up brains by human traffickers and drug dealers or movie makers it make it normal life as normal ,so what's the matter where you put the dick in as long as is hole ,Anal,mouth ,ear nose or they might innovate extra holes in human for more fun or computer dulls that even can make sexy noises ,such oh yeh baby do it ,I'm horny are you ready too or many other horny words you know it's easy to program it and you will have remote control to choose the channel .Even your mom can have one and market all will be full of them so you do not need to divorce or fight and buy as many you want So rapist problem it will be solve ,gay problems will be solved ,lesbians and homosexual problem will be solved and every body will be happy ever after .World will be in the peace and human will be vanish.Imagine world without the religions ,Rule,confusion,fear ,rap ,assault.Total sexual freedom with any computer you want of course depend on your budget .I just afraid of Computer trafficking and hackers or viruses dealers at that time .
karen
2015-09-06 16:01:05 UTC
gays can so reproduce. many straight people can't. anyway, if you read the studies they don't say there is a 'gay gene'. it's more complicated than that.
CECIL W
2015-09-07 00:41:25 UTC
No! Our foods/waters to nourish are so inferior that we are lucky to come out as well as we do. What we don't see and know about food wise.... would scare us into crazy. BTW...our Congress people eat only organics, and the best that our tax money can purchase for them. Many of these anomolies are due to inferior foods and go far beyond just being genetics.
Art
2015-09-07 11:18:37 UTC
No they still have parents and siblings who carry the gene. There is also the postulated theory that homosexuality is a result of population pressure , that is there are too many people around so nature or our genetics are producing more homosexual (none breeding) pairs to reduce the population to a reasonable level
Oyel
2015-09-07 02:55:23 UTC
lol I think being gay is a choice. Someone developes the feeling to sleep with another man, and starts working towards achieving that goal. personally I can't be gay.
2015-09-05 12:46:47 UTC
Whilst being straight, I am actually offended because it implies that these people are afflicted by some form of genetic abnormality. I dislike your tone and intent in the question.



You can still respect someone even if you don't agree with that particular lifestyle.
sasha
2015-09-08 16:30:23 UTC
Actually, if the gay couples involved are women then they may use either of their eggs and a sperm donor. If they are men they may either of their semen and a female egg donor plus a surrogate mother. All said it means that there will be a passing down of some of the said genes with the exception of if they decide to have children only through adoption.
jake
2015-09-08 07:20:58 UTC
Genetics are complicated. People with Down syndrome are born to "normal" parents. People with red hair are born to people without. If being gay is genetic it would be hard to factor. I personally favor the opinion that homosexuality is more based on environment, with a genetic predisposition being a major component.
harpertara
2015-09-05 09:09:05 UTC
No. It really isn't a gene, but a malformation of one that can occur in any conception. So Heterosexual people are creating more homosexuals all the time.
?
2015-09-07 21:10:53 UTC
The more sons a woman has the more likely the youngest will be gay. I would imagine that this serves to curtail the family gene pool that makes the women have more boys than girls.
jonathan
2015-09-05 08:04:12 UTC
It could be that the mother passes on the gene to a gay male child and the father passes the one unto the lesbian child.



"gays can't reproduce" Yes they can. They're gay, not sterile. One of the parents might also be Lesbian/Gay/Bisexual.
S
2015-09-05 08:20:50 UTC
Well to hear scientists tell it, it is the mother who passes this gene or if moms is not gay, it will probably not die out. Also, if it was that simple, we would not have all the other illnesses or diseases like Down Syndrome, Dwarfism, etc. Understand the world is cursed.
tanmoy
2015-09-07 17:40:19 UTC
If I have an option I choose to be straight ,to live simply ,happy and accepted in the society. I'm not a kind of gay who dress like a lady . If I have an option I choose to be straight ,to live simply ,happy and accepted in the society.
Frankie
2015-09-08 03:23:53 UTC
No, because all fetuses are female to begin with and sexual preference has to do with chemical interactions in the fetus that make it stay female or turn male and if the chemistry is not what would be considered "normal" to create a straight female or a straight male you end up with a girl that like girls a guy that likes guys or even a person that likes both sexes
Alessa
2015-09-07 13:18:35 UTC
But that's the thing... you choose to be gay. There isn't a "gay gene." Its a choice, plain and simple.
2015-09-07 18:18:27 UTC
It's not genetics and it's not a choice.
ANONYMOUSLY
2015-09-05 12:00:12 UTC
GAY IS NOT GENETIC NEITHER IS ADULTERY, PROSTITUTION

GOD WOULD NOT PURPOSELY CREATE A PERSON WHO WOULD

BE PREDESTINED TO DO ACTS THAT ARE AN ABOMINATION TO HIM

IT WOULD NOT MAKE SENSE. GOD CANNOT CREATE EVIL. YOU

HAVE A CHOICE TO COMMIT ADULTERY, OR HOMOSEXUALITY, OR BANK ROBBERY ETC. AND GOD WOULD NOT HAVE

DESTROYED SODOM AND GOMORRAH FOR DOING THE EXACT SAME ACTS OF IMPURITIES IF HE MADE YOU THAT WAY IN THE FIRST PLACE. THE EXCUSES NEED TO STOP NOTHING IMPURE WILL EVER ENTER HEAVEN, AND THE ONLY WAY TO BECOME PURE AGAIN IS TO CONFESS ALL YOUR SINS AND ASK FOR

FORGIVENESS. GOD DOES NOT FORGIVE SINS IF YOU DONT ASK HIM TOO. YOU HAVE A FREE WILL TO DO EVIL OR GOOD. THIS WARNING GOD WOULD NEVER HAD MADE IF IT WERE OK TO COMMIT MORTAL SINS>>>>>>

In Jude 1:5-10, St. Jude warns us all about what will happen to the unbelievers, who revile God:



"Now I desire to remind you, though you were once for all fully informed, that he who saved a people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who did not believe. And the angels that did not keep their own position but left their proper dwelling have been kept by him in eternal chains in the nether gloom until the judgment of the great day; But when the archangel Michael, contending with the devil, disputed about the body of Moses, he did not presume to pronounce a reviling judgment upon him, but said, "The Lord rebuke you." But these men revile whatever they do not understand, and by those things that they know by instinct as irrational animals do, they are destroyed." just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise acted immorally and indulged in unnatural lust, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.Yet in like manner these men in their dreamings defile the flesh, reject authority, and revile the glorious ones.



Notice also in the above Word of God that practicing homosexuals and the lustful who do not repent before death do not get a pass.
sunshine
2015-09-07 02:39:52 UTC
Yes you be testing for cancer laser treatment ,you lost gaiety next.
Joshua
2015-09-08 19:04:59 UTC
It could die off if they were the only children of the parents throwing gay genes.
Daphne
2015-09-07 13:52:45 UTC
No they have been brainwashed by themselves or society as to how males are supposed to act so they have been duped. So has the society who promote such BS who believe stereotyped ideas not based on facts. If you have male parts you are male. Under close observation your DNA doesn't lie, even though they will try to. They are LIARS! FEW LIARS WILL CONFESS THAT THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE AND WILL GO ON AND ON ABOUT IT. THEY LIVE A LIE AND LOVE IT THAT WAY. LET THEM GO ON IN THEIR DELUSION IT IS A FREE COUNTRY. Their also are vagina envious of us females also.

They are also perverts, mental cases.

Look up pervert.
SRB101
2015-09-10 01:01:00 UTC
You have to understand that string-segments in a whole string of DNA can be set to "off" or "on" as that string is built. One can argue that all Blue-eyed Europeans should have been bred out by now, since those genes are recessive. The same with Red Heads.
2015-09-05 19:45:29 UTC
Gays can reproduce. Artificial insemination or closing their eyes and pretending she's a man I suppose.
?
2015-09-05 20:27:38 UTC
Just to clarify... a Lesbian can reproduce and so can a gay man. They just can't with their partners. A lot of LGBT couples use their own sperm and egg to have a baby.
?
2015-09-05 18:03:07 UTC
That's the fun part about being gay.



IT'S NOT BLOODY GENETIC.
Ethan
2015-09-08 15:16:16 UTC
No, as the gene/genes can be passed down through siblings which might not be gay but have the gene meaning their offspring could be gay
?
2015-09-10 07:11:16 UTC
Gayness gene is recessive, so it survives among both heteros and gays. Nature is wise, making for a percentage of the population to care for orphans.
UFOs
2015-09-05 09:18:07 UTC
Exactly. Rom 1:26 For this reason God gave them up to evil passions, and their women were changing the natural use into one which is unnatural:

Rom 1:27 And in the same way the men gave up the natural use of the woman and were burning in their desire for one another, men doing shame with men, and getting in their bodies the right reward of their evil-doing.

Rom 1:28 And because they had not the mind to keep God in their knowledge, God gave them up to an evil mind, to do those things which are not right;

Rom 1:29 Being full of all wrongdoing, evil, desire for the goods of others, hate, envy, putting to death, fighting, deceit, cruel ways, evil talk, and false statements about others;

Rom 1:30 Hated by God, full of pride, without respect, full of loud talk, given to evil inventions, not honouring father or mother,

Rom 1:31 Without knowledge, not true to their undertakings, unkind, having no mercy:

Rom 1:32 Who, though they have knowledge of the law of God, that the fate of those who do these things is death, not only go on doing these things themselves, but give approval to those who do them.
?
2015-09-06 00:44:18 UTC
You clearly don't understand how genetics work. It really isn't that simple. If what you say is true then genetically caused infertility shouldn't exist.
2015-09-05 17:44:44 UTC
Look up "kin selection".



Gay children are born from straight parents.



If having a gay child or two aids the survival of such straight parents, then the trait will propagate.
Frederick
2015-09-06 15:17:51 UTC
I doubt think homosexuality is inherited either, what did you do when you had your sexual impulse? what did you choose to do? However, if large numbers people chose same sex unions it would doubtless effect the human population. After all: the population of California has ceased to replace itself and that's only with counterconseptiv drugs and abortions.
?
2015-09-08 17:34:58 UTC
That's a question you have to ask the evolutionists. You'll make their heads explode by doing so.
Jose Anthony
2015-09-06 14:21:52 UTC
bruh they can tell in genetics good genes from bad genes. like abs run in the family or everyone in that family is born weird. stupid stuff like that but were is the proof about being gay is genetic. i want to see the proof too lol
Aurelie
2015-09-08 05:22:13 UTC
It's absolutely not it's just a CHOICE
2015-09-05 21:19:36 UTC
No the Gene is passed on from both Mother and Father of so called Straight people
MissCherokee
2015-09-06 17:22:14 UTC
Same sex attraction seems to be in part , indeed genetic. Not entirely , but this inclination towards that seems to be genetic , and where do your genes come from? Your parents. So some where along the line this genetic inclination for same sex attraction got into the gene pool , and rather quite early in humankind's genome history.

Like anything sexual , intercourse , etc,. that is consensual , it is a decision we make who and whatever we choose to act that out on or with. Never having had those feelings of same sex attraction I cannot comment on what it would be like. I can imagine , for some it is quite conflicting and a big big part of life. All the things that would go with making the choice to identify and go with what your nature is inclining you to do. I can see where people would not want to be seen nor feel different from anybody else. Yet they are compelled and attracted to those of the same sex. Some people repress it. How lonely that must feel. Even if they felt that for some reason they must repress it , but never telling anyone how they feel and what they are going through. Others seem to celebrate their sexual orientation identity , feel compelled to 'come out' and either be accepted by those they are not sure would accept them , or suffer the consequences of possible

alienation from family , friends, etc,. I personally have known women that were so fed up with the male relationships in their lives , their history with men , that they chose to become lesbian. Felt more unity and understanding , etc,. In this instance , it is a clear choice , as opposed to genetic wiring. I won't go into what my personal feelings are , because they don't matter. I don't have to deal with this issue. I don't hold some one's choice against them , knowing the person first is what it is about for me. When my two gay friends told me how scared they are from the attitudes they get from people , etc I felt very bad for them and sad. Knowing them , I thought , " how would any one treat Johnny like that , he is such a sweetie , nice man , kind, sincere and non indulgent. " They confided in me their dilemma's .. One not caring whilst the other was more fearful. I totally felt for them , and looked past anything I could see myself maybe being prejudiced against. I don't like feeling prejudice. I don't like judging. When we get into the aberrant side of human sexual proclivities , that is where I draw the line. Straight and gay. Mess with kids, I hate you. Agenda and groom unknowing young people , no. Too many times our culture sexualizes our youth and puts demands on them , they aren't developmentally prepared nor ready for. Pedophilia , etc,. needs to be wiped out. That is where the real sinning is. And this pertains to both gay and straight. Children , the young are OFF LIMITS. There is a push to accept pedophilia as a sexual orientation. It may be , but some where along that line , the wiring and morals and parental involvement in teaching your children , about what is sexually legal , and what is not , and what is most reprehensible and incurable is the propensity to develop a sexual desire for children. This needs to stop . Children cannot consent even if they say okay. Gay , straight , age of consent needs to be kept. Child pornography , child trafficking , child sex trade is where the slimiest of humans are. This needs to be brought to the forefront and taken on just like war on drugs , or equal rights. With that much fervor and dedication. Why the human race has not championed for the weakest of us all , with a louder voice , I don't know. Breaks my heart. When you want to get into sinning and who's what ever doing wrong , and then quote God as saying "Bad". People of age have the right to choose what they want. sin or no sin. . Let's talk about what He says about pedophilia. Jesus Christ mentions , offending the little ones. and if you do , it is better that you put a millstone around your neck and cast yourself into the sea than offend one of His little ones. We have no right to judge some one who chooses legally different than what we straight folks would. However , if little kids are being sexually exploited abused , etc,. it's time we unite against this.
?
2015-09-05 15:45:31 UTC
http://www.sciencefocus.com/feature/life/gay-genetics



"Regardless of which regions of DNA are linked to homosexuality, the very existence of ‘gay genes’ creates a Darwinian paradox. How would genes that cause homosexuality pass from one generation to the next, given that gay people reproduce less than heterosexuals? Natural selection opposes anything that might cause even a small reduction in the number of offspring you produce, so a gay trait would soon disappear from the gene pool. “If you carry a trait that reduces your fecundity [the number of offspring you produce] by 10 per cent, in seven to eight generations your trait and all your descendents disappear,” says Camperio Ciani.



The paradox was finally resolved by his 15-year-old daughter. After Camperio Ciani described the observed patterns in pedigrees of homosexuality – the effects of maternal inheritance and birth order – his daughter suggested that he re-check his data to see if the female relatives of gay men had more children on the mother’s side. When Camperio Ciani went back to the lab, that’s exactly what he found. “Mothers and aunts on the maternal line of homosexuals had around one-fifth to one-fourth more kids than the heterosexual comparison, and also than the paternal line.”



He thinks that the evolution of homosexuality is driven by a process called sexually antagonistic selection. It’s where a genetic factor confers an advantage when expressed in one sex, but incurs an evolutionary cost in the other. In this instance, the ‘gay genes’ don’t exist to make men homosexual, instead they’re a consequence of ‘fertility factors’ that help women reproduce."



*********



gays are not infertile. even now - but probably more in the past - gays have married the opposite sex and had children due to either confusion of sexual identity or fear of societal recriminations.



also, some gay couple choose to use one of their eggs or the sperm from one of them for a surrogate to carry the child.



********



"In 1996 Blanchard and Professor Tony Bogaert revealed a peculiar phenomenon: the more older brothers a boy has, the greater their chances of being homosexual. This ‘fraternal birth order effect’ meant that each subsequent brother increases the odds of being gay by 33 per cent. An only child has a two per cent chance, but with 10 brothers the odds are over 20 per cent. But why the increasing odds? Blanchard believes it’s related to how a mother’s body protects itself when pregnant with a son.



“There’s only one system in the mother that would have the ‘memory’ to know how many male foetuses she’s previously carried: the immune system,” says Professor Blanchard. According to his theory, a mother’s immune system keeps track of the number of sons she’s already had, producing antibodies to protect her against male-specific proteins entering her bloodstream, which often occurs during childbirth. As the mother’s level of immunisation increases with each son, so too do the chances of variation from typical sexual orientation as, in theory, the mother’s antibodies could cross the placenta and neutralise proteins that her son needs for normal sexual development.



Many of these male-specific proteins are found on the Y chromosome, DNA that’s foreign to females. “A lot of male-specific proteins are preferentially expressed in the testes and have a crucial role in sperm development,” says Blanchard. “Some are expressed in the foetal brain for reasons that no-one has established, but you wouldn’t expect them to be expressed without a reason.”



Blanchard believes that homosexuality is “100 per cent biological”, and estimates that the fraternal birth order effect accounts for 15-30 per cent of gay men in the population."





READ THE WHOLE ARTICLE.
Antonio
2015-09-05 08:03:47 UTC
Maybe it is passed down and not present in all family members, but it's not genetic.
Billy Butthead
2015-09-07 02:14:03 UTC
The quantum effect rules that part of genetics so it won't disappear.
2015-09-07 13:32:12 UTC
Theoretically, yeah, but it's not genetic
Grinning Football plinny younger
2015-09-07 14:31:01 UTC
They can, they just don't do it as readily because they don't fancy the right people but their straight siblings have an easier time.
Dragon
2015-09-08 23:28:21 UTC
If stupidity is genetic, this question wouldn't exist...
Girlie Electrics
2015-09-08 11:05:24 UTC
The female siblings of homosexual males are more fecund ( shorter interval between births) so in the absence of effective contraception, the gene(s) do get passed to their more numerous than average neices/ nephews
2015-09-07 07:09:46 UTC
It has been less than twenty years since some people started saying that gayness is genetic. If that were true, don t you think people would have figured it out several thousand years sooner?
?
2015-09-05 11:33:21 UTC
If it were true, and they are born that way, (in sin) then that is reason enough to be born again. Jus like a born liar, a born thief, a born drunk . . .



Romans 3:23 NKJV

for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,
2015-09-09 05:24:21 UTC
Never thought of it that way If you are right then that proves how screwed up the homos are. The can't even get their excuse right.
?
2015-09-05 13:58:09 UTC
There is no gene for Rudeness, Selfishness or kindness.. Still it gets Passed on. No gene for stupidity too
Maiz
2015-09-06 16:08:20 UTC
Yes
J T
2015-09-07 17:20:05 UTC
Because it takes two heterosexuals to create the combination of genes that it takes to create a homosexual. This article explains it well:



http://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/news/20050128/is-there-gay-gene
live
2015-09-06 14:18:12 UTC
I never even knew being gay was genetic wow 😂
2015-09-05 08:01:38 UTC
Being gay is a choice
2015-09-06 22:32:19 UTC
being gay is queer, like a bundle of sticks..on top of another bundle of sticks..

it's all about choice...except..blah blah and blah blah and blah.

everything else is choice man, Yet as it is written once who've turned your are turned and then justification and rationalisation of your decision becomes apparent. the best one is saying I was born like that...

God bless my gay family members, I not jusdge them for they are already judged.
Alexandra
2015-09-06 20:53:16 UTC
Yes and I really wish it would. That's all this world needs, is more *******. Ya know?
?
2015-09-08 23:35:54 UTC
Nope
2015-09-05 08:26:25 UTC
You're absolutely correct. "Gayness" will die out just as soon as heterosexuals quit having children.
?
2015-09-05 12:09:13 UTC
95% of male walruses never mate. Sexual reproduction isn't the only factor in evolution.
2015-09-05 19:59:16 UTC
Correct.
Tracer
2015-09-06 20:47:25 UTC
Didn't realize so many straight people were so ill-informed and proud to share it.
cuthberta
2015-09-06 14:50:03 UTC
Interesting. Of course they can reproduce though - with women
TTown
2015-09-08 10:13:33 UTC
That particular urban myth was disproved 30 years ago. It is a behavioral trait.
?
2015-09-05 12:14:57 UTC
If. If circles weren't round would tires roll? Stupid question huh?
?
2015-09-07 23:05:21 UTC
No, as u said gay is born genetically not wontedly!
2015-09-05 19:11:57 UTC
gays arent produced by 2 gay people.



ur logic makes no sense
?
2015-09-05 18:18:29 UTC
Gays can and do reproduce. I was married to one.
lok
2015-09-06 18:23:59 UTC
Guys, guys, as anyone just realized this fellow here has hit some kind of a blunt too damn fine
?
2015-09-06 03:38:24 UTC
A homosexual man CAN impregnate a woman but he isn't sexually attracted to her.
Rezaul
2015-09-09 02:51:18 UTC
gay people CAN reproduce. Not every gay person is 100% homosexual.
?
2015-09-05 08:00:55 UTC
Gays can reproduce, they just wont like it as much.
Defender of Truth
2015-09-05 12:39:06 UTC
No, it is a choice...



Homosexual Behavior a gross sin:



Unlawful sexual relations  

Do not imitate the Canaanites  

Various incestuous relations  

Homosexual acts 

Bestiality  

‘Stay clean, or the land will vomit you out’  



This is in 1 Cor.: 9 Or do you not know that unrighteous people will not inherit God’s Kingdom? Do not be misled. Those who are sexually immoral, idolaters, adulterers, men who submit to homosexual acts, men who practice homosexuality, 10 thieves, greedy people, drunkards, revilers, and extortioners will not inherit God’s Kingdom. 11 And yet that is what some of you were. But you have been washed clean; you have been sanctified; you have been declared righteous in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and with the spirit of our God. 



Romans 1:26-27 

English Standard Version (ESV) 

26 For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; 27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.



(1 Thessalonians 4:3-5) For this is the will of God, that you should be holy and abstain from sexual immorality. 4 Each one of you should know how to control his own body in holiness and honor, 5 not with greedy, uncontrolled sexual passion like the nations have that do not know God.



The penalty was death in Bible times (Hebrew scriptures) and forbidden in the Greek scriptures, too! 



God will do away with all badness: 



“…the cowards and those without faith and those who are disgusting in their filth and murderers and the sexually immoral and those practicing spiritism and idolaters and all the liars their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur. This means the second death.”  



Read more:http://www.gotquestions.org/fornication-adultery.html#ixzz3T4OINzgY 



They took the rainbow and took away a thing of beauty!
S.J.
2015-09-06 17:51:41 UTC
Of course folks who are gay can produce.. there are sperm and egg banks.. and non-gay people use these banks for whatever reason, plus there are plenty of all kinds of people who contribute to sperm and egg banks..

.
2015-09-05 07:59:53 UTC
its passed on to the gay from the mother while in the womb...if there is such a thing as a gay gene
Infinity
2015-09-06 12:37:01 UTC
It is just a disease of the mind that affects only the human beings .
Heike
2015-09-05 11:15:32 UTC
Gays can reproduce. They are not infertile.
?
2015-09-08 08:18:17 UTC
my lecture say if parent some smoke will born a gay child
hiniikken
2015-09-05 15:37:24 UTC
Its a selfish gene, it refuses to quit
Yasmin
2015-09-05 13:00:55 UTC
Damn. What Has The World Come To.
?
2015-09-13 20:27:28 UTC
No, it is actually an evolutionary advantage that reduces overpopulation. It is well-documented in many mammalian species.
kim
2015-09-08 17:15:57 UTC
Choosing Gay means IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII memememememe
Vinegar Taster
2015-09-06 08:16:15 UTC
What about being left handed ?
Mont K
2015-09-07 18:37:13 UTC
after millions of years of evolution gay guys will be able to have babies out their weiners
?
2015-09-09 12:02:47 UTC
being gay is both genetic and environmental. its all connected/influenced.....the question is which factor is stronger.
Kenny
2015-09-05 14:04:55 UTC
No, but hopefully the AIDS their disgusting fornication spreads will kill them off.
nobudE
2015-09-05 20:22:01 UTC
Is that from the "then why are there still apes?" Biology home school library.
Geri42
2015-09-06 15:39:27 UTC
Sodomy is a sexual preference. It has nothing to do with genetic make-up.
2015-09-06 08:42:37 UTC
There is no genetic predisposition to homosexuality.
leah
2015-09-08 07:46:01 UTC
Well gay females can, they just need a sperm doner
?
2015-09-06 05:12:08 UTC
It is possible. But it requires common prayer from all devotees.
NEXT
2015-09-05 18:58:13 UTC
Thats logical, however logic is not the "progressives" strong suit.
Bob's Uncle
2015-09-08 14:56:31 UTC
If it were just one gene, then yes.
prajwal
2015-09-08 06:42:59 UTC
no gay is not gentic. if it was genetic it would have died a long time ago.
Megan
2015-09-06 12:42:51 UTC
😳 really? Ok we need to rethink out education standards
2015-09-05 16:19:28 UTC
LMFAO. Straight couples produce homosexual children.
2015-09-06 01:53:19 UTC
some gays donate sperms and their offspring are everywhere
?
2015-09-05 11:43:24 UTC
unless it was a recessive gene
Nowpower
2015-09-05 17:18:26 UTC
A miracle?
?
2015-09-07 11:14:59 UTC
that would be correct, but being gay is not genentic
?
2015-09-06 20:13:26 UTC
Hmm maybe
fred
2015-09-08 10:39:44 UTC
Homophobic question, not answering. Next question!
2015-09-05 12:49:41 UTC
yes
Torin
2015-09-08 01:38:32 UTC
Homosexuals are not infertile, fool.
2015-09-05 14:20:16 UTC
MY SON IS GAY AND HE CHOOSE TO BE A QUEERMOSEEXUAL
Liberals Are Garbage
2015-09-07 07:51:59 UTC
they are mentally ill, just like most democrats
ray
2015-09-05 14:42:23 UTC
homoism us a cvhouce
Lauren
2015-09-07 20:03:01 UTC
well the thing is toads are green so i have no idea
2015-09-09 11:05:23 UTC
is genetic
?
2015-09-05 14:19:31 UTC
By that logic, there would be no worker bees.
Rosemarie
2015-09-07 07:50:12 UTC
Nice! I love it.
saima
2015-09-08 03:34:57 UTC
its a sin by choice.
?
2015-09-06 19:09:48 UTC
no, its not genetic its hormonal
compasionatewarrior
2015-09-06 14:06:33 UTC
If it were only so!!
luisa l hi
2015-09-06 01:09:04 UTC
PEOPLE LIKE YOU DESTROY THE CHOICES OF OTHERS?.
2015-09-06 14:18:31 UTC
GAY IS A DISEASE
Jennifer
2015-09-08 21:04:52 UTC
of course they can.
2015-09-07 04:00:16 UTC
yep.
ilikedell1988
2015-09-13 09:53:36 UTC
no
2015-09-07 12:07:18 UTC
lol no
?
2015-09-07 08:07:56 UTC
ok, a i dont think it is, and b, no.
2015-09-07 05:43:19 UTC
no you homophobic prick
daicactus
2015-09-05 13:26:46 UTC
Please somebody, anybody tell me this is a troll.
?
2015-09-08 18:24:31 UTC
no.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...