Do you think that dinosaurs and humans were alive at the same time?

Question

I for one believe that we were both walking the face of the earth together.

A major discovery has been made in Glen Rose. During the 1930’s a talented rock craftsman named George Adams fabricated a couple of human footprints, along with several dinosaur footprints. These were sold to passing tourists in order to make money during the great depression. One of his “human” footprints was so good that he buried it when a Smithsonian representative began asking to see the “astounding discovery.”

"The Adams family is held in high esteem among honorable citizens throughout the Glen Rose area. The most famous of the brothers was Ernest Tolbert Adams, an Oxford scholar and noted attorney. Ernest is credited with discovering the first dinosaur footprints and several human footprints in the sedimentary rocks of the Paluxy River. George Adams was well respected in his own right as a gifted painter and rock mason. I held extensive discussions with George’s daughter and son-in-law during my early years in Glen Rose. These good people were friends of the museum and, being familiar with their father’s skills, affirmed that none of the footprints in our possession were carved.

Each time our museum team discovers new human footprints in the sedimentary rock some evolutionist will refer to the 1930’s carved footprints, and erroneously claim that we have simply re-discovered one of those prints, or perhaps carved them ourselves. Such was the case in the recent discovery of the marvelous “Delk” footprint.

The mystery and confusion can now be laid to rest. Dennis Moore, a local pastor and friend of the museum, was searching through the rock and dirt at the old Adams home place. As the enclosed photo shows, he discovered the original carved footprint half buried near the cellar. With permission from the family we had CT Scans performed, and found no compression density under any of the carved print. All of our genuine footprints show clear density compression in the appropriate areas.

Thank you for your faithful support of our credible research and declaration of creation truth. We are pleased to be your representative in the cause for our Creator."

http://75.125.60.6/~creatio1/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5&Itemid=7

Now I know many of you will say that it's just a fabrication, but I'm just going to say you're wrong unless you provide adequate scientific evidence from highly qualified scientists. Because I could say that evolutionist throw the human remains away when they find them beside animals believed to pre-date humans.

Answer 1

Yes man did walk with dinasaurs. That is the truth. Here's exctly what scientists say about that;

YOUTUBE- The 10th foundational falsehood of creationism

Fast forward to 6:00 to get right to the point.

Answer 2

It is a fabrication. Your saying that evolutionists throw human remains away has no legitimacy as a counter-argument because reality is not bimodal. I am not saying that humans did not exist at the same time as dinosaurs, but this site is clearly a bunch of cobbled together **** (as is most creationist "evidence"). I know that evolution exists because I have seen it before my very eyes. As the same mechanisms that I witnessed hold true in human populations, I know at the very least that evolution in humans is true. I have not witnessed valid evidence of humans living at the same time as dinosaurs (even after visiting your site) so I will not make that claim. In other words, as I have still not been presented with conclusive evidence that humans and dinosaurs coexisted, I do not think that they did.



My argument holds all the water there is because it is based on logic rather than the insane opinion of someone from Yahoo answers and a poorly designed pseudoscientific website from internet hell. Since you've asked for more than just my "opinion", read "the God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins, one of the most accomplished and published scientists (people who know things, unlike you) of the past few decades.



What I speak of is not adaptation, as adaptation implies an improvement toward sustaining life in a certain niche. Your other question even brought up some genetic problems which are obviously not adaptation. They are caused by mutations in DNA - one source of evolution, and simple recombination - another.

Answer 3

You remind me of a woman in an abusive relationship, who needs to believe that things will get better, so she just keeps on taking the abuse.