Which does not indicate evidence of common ancestry?

Question

Hi, I've got a question regarding common ancestry that I'm unsure about, thank you.

Which of the following does not indicate evidence of common ancestry
a. most morphological traits shared among organisms
b. comparable regions of the DNA sequences
c. morphological traits in fossils
d. features that are evidence of convergent evolution

Answer 1

d



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergent_evolution#Examples

Answer 2

the part of get sparkling is this: no-one might additionally be discussing "introduction" interior the context of the type of technology in which you're patently nicely versed except particular deluded idelogues had compelled it onto the time table. Does the technology stack up? the overpowering majority of scientists say it does. of people who do no longer, maximum are fundamentalists and can be discounted. That leaves some awkward beggars who may be onto something: this is may be how new scientific breakthroughs are accomplished, by ability of somebody refusing to have self assurance what they have continuously been taught and checking out an determination. what won't ensue, in any available universe, is that Darwinian orthodoxy will provide thank you to any form of creationism, identity or some version thereof. If as you're saying you haven't any longer any religious pastime in this question, that could desire to come back to you as an superb alleviation. because it happens i'm a theistic evolutionist. God is the source of life; evolution tells the tale of ways we've been given right here. what's the undertaking? Oh yeah, the Bible. nicely, the Bible isn't approximately technology. it is from a pre-scientific subculture. this is why there's no longer something in it approximately evolution. Or calculus. Or quantum mechanics. Or chemistry, even. It has a distinctive variety of value. undertaking solved. there's no longer something to communicate truly.

Answer 3

d