can some one give me 6 pieces of evidence for evolution i have an essay due tomorrow i also need help .....?

Question

i need to do an essay that due tomorrow and i need help in the pieces of Evidence that supports the essay and i also need the Darwin's part in the development some one please help me :{

Answer 1

How about 10 categories of evidence?



Here is an answer I wrote up a long time ago listing 10 categories of evidence for evolution ... see my answer to the following question:

https://answersrip.com/question/index?qid=20061114162706AAJ3vs9



As for Darwin's part in the theory ... Darwin contributed the concept of natural selection. This finally gave evolution a *mechanism* ... something that *causes* evolution to occur ... it explains *WHY* evolution occurs, and thus just how powerful it is (because it is *relentless*).



Darwin's theory is really simple. It consists of three observations and a conclusion:

Observation 1: Variation. Individuals of a species vary in their traits.

Observation 2: Inheritance. Individuals of a species pass traits onto offspring.

Observation 3: Competition. More individuals are born than can survive, so they are competing for survival and reproduction.

Conclusion: Natural selection. Those individuals born with traits that give them some slight advantage in that competition for survival and reproduction, will *on average* leave more offspring. Therefore those traits get passed onto more members of future generations, and thus the population *changes* (it evolves).



That's it.

Answer 2

One of the problems with the idea of evolution is that we never see any creatures evolving into a more complex, different kind. Evolution of this sort (macroevolution) has never once been observed.



Variation within kinds which we do observe (microevolution) is not the same as macroevolution, and the former has never been demonstrated to lead to the latter.



Science deals with what you can see, observe, record, test, repeat, etc.



Evolution (macro) can not be demonstrated or supported with the scientific method. The current atomic theory can; the theory of gravity can; but evolution can’t. How many experiments do you know of that demonstrate amoeba-to-man evolution? None.



Evolution (macro) has never been seen, repeated, recorded, etc., so it is neither a scientific theory nor even a scientific idea. It's a conjecture, an unsupported leap of faith, and worse: a lie, since God already said how He made things.



Please see these links for further study:



http://www.icr.org/



http://creation.com/



http://www.answersingenesis.org/



http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=romans%201:16%20-%2032&version=50



http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=genesis%201&version=50

Answer 3

There are several things that disprove Evolution. 1. "No Genetic Information Being Added" When scientists look under the microscope they see no observable evidence of any new genetic code (or DNA) slowly being added over time for a species. In fact, we don't see one kind of living animal forming into another kind of living animal (i.e. a reptile forming into a bird). It is only thru the interpretation of bones and guess work that such crazy assumptions are made. 2. "Life Does not Come From Non-Life" Evolution proposes that life originated from non life. However, we don't see rocks, lava, stars, or nebulas creating any single celled oganisms. There is no observable evidence whatsoever that even remotely suggests this ridiculous concept. 3. "Guess Words in Secular Science" The next time you read a secular science article or journal entry, please get your highlighter out and start highlighting the "Guess Words" within them. If you do, you will find such words as "Could be", "May be", "Suggests", "Is a possibility", ECT. In other words, when you read the highlighted words in perspective of the Science they are claiming, you will notice that the they are not sure about the Science they are pushing. Why? Because there is no observable science to back up Macro-Evolution. 4. "Micro-Evolution is not Macro-Evolution" Macro-Evolution is the big jump of one animal kind forming into another animal kind despite any living observable examples. Micro-Evolution is the small micro-changes within the DNA of animal that it already has. So when we see caterpillars forming into butterflies, we are not seeing a new animal kind forming but the same animal kind. In other words, that caterpillar with wings is not going to form into anything but something that is an insect. It is not going to gain any new DNA magically over time just because we wish it to be true. Micro-Evolution is an observable fact. Macro-Evolution has no observable science to back it up. Pure and simple. However, many scientists point to Micro-Evolution as proof of Macro-Evolution. However, they are completely 2 different concepts and should not be confused to be the same thing as secular scientists wish it to be. ....

Answer 4

Here's a good source of information:



http://evolution.berkeley.edu/



.

Answer 5

they just found anew monkey that is suposedly the missing link. shes the only piece i know.



http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/05/090519-missing-link-found.html

Answer 6

the fact that dinosaurs once lived and are now extinct

Answer 7

Don'tgive into the Darwinist lies !



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMpk7WerFWw